Describe Error_evaluation here.
Here are a list of error evaluation tools and ideas
- formal uncertainty -- standard, bottom of the RESIDUALS.TXT. Contains the fit of all the landmarks and overlaps.
- Best 80% of landmarks. Taken from ?
- CompareOBJ
- CompareOBJ TR
- CompareOBJ --save-plate-error error
- diffShape and gnuplot delta.gpi
- SIGMAS.TXT plotted with sig.gpi
- 2D heat map plot of number of images in landmarks
- 2D heat map plot of residual errors for landmark
- 2D heat map plot of residual errors for images
- Evaluation of delta between truth S/C position and solved for S/C position: as an RMS
- 2D plot of delta between truth S/C position and solved for S/C position.
Number of "issues" (or >>) in MAPINFO, PICINFO and RESIDUALS.TXT
To Do
- Rebuild shape 3.7
- Get RMS for each ZMAP
Run PreSurvey CompareOBJ
RESIDUALS
- img x, y val val overlap x, y val val img x, y val val
- The 1st column is a list of 1. IMAGEFILES included in the landmark 2. overlaps with other landmarks 3. Limbs
- The 2nd column is the error in deltaX (# pixels in image resolution)
- The 3rd column is the error in deltaY (# pixels in image resolution)
- The 4th column is the magnitude of the error (combines deltaX and deltaY)
- The 5th column is the error in physical units (km)
......................... name val
MAPINFO.TXT name ........ val val
- col 9 formal uncertainty in meters of the landmark position
- col 10 Flag
">>" Flag showing landmarks that are below the pixel threshold. You might want to look at.
- "**" Fewer than 3 images
- col 11 Residual in meters of the nominals and position
PICINFO.TXT name ....... val dx, dy, dz dCx, dCy, dCz
- Col 7 - Pixel residual (RMS in pixels)