Differences between revisions 5 and 6
Revision 5 as of 2016-01-15 17:51:08
Size: 2502
Editor: EricPalmer
Comment:
Revision 6 as of 2016-01-15 17:53:21
Size: 2523
Editor: EricPalmer
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 34: Line 34:
 * Diff shape {{attachment:Mslp.jpg}}
 * Sigmas {{attachment:Mslp.jpg}}
 * Resolution of maplets {{attachment:Mslp.jpg}}
 * Number of images in a maplet {{attachment:Mslp.jpg}} {{attachment:Mslp.jpg}}
 * MAPINFO's residuals (col 9) for each maplet {{attachment:Mslp.jpg}}
 * Diff shape {{attachment:delta-P10.png}}
 * Sigmas {{attachment:sigma-P10.png}}
 * Resolution of maplets {{attachment:MapResP10.jpg}}
 * Number of images in a maplet {{attachment:imgNo1.jpg}} {{attachment:imgNo2.jpg}}
 * MAPINFO's residuals (col 9) for each maplet {{attachment:mapErr.jpg}}

Describe Error_evaluation here.

Here are a list of error evaluation tools and ideas

  • formal uncertainty -- standard, bottom of the RESIDUALS.TXT. Contains the fit of all the landmarks and overlaps.
  • Best 80% of landmarks. Taken from ?
  • CompareOBJ
  • CompareOBJ TR
  • CompareOBJ --save-plate-error error
  • diffShape and gnuplot delta.gpi
  • SIGMAS.TXT plotted with sig.gpi
  • 2D heat map plot of number of images in landmarks
  • 2D heat map plot of residual errors for landmark
  • 2D heat map plot of residual errors for images
  • Evaluation of delta between truth S/C position and solved for S/C position: as an RMS
  • 2D plot of delta between truth S/C position and solved for S/C position.
  • Number of "issues" (or >>) in MAPINFO, PICINFO and RESIDUALS.TXT

To Do

  • Rebuild shape 3.7
  • Get RMS for each ZMAP
  • Run PreSurvey CompareOBJ

--

  • formal uncertanity 0.5179
  • RMS 1.447
  • RMS w/ TR 1.046
  • DiffShape 1.771

  • Diff shape delta-P10.png

  • Sigmas sigma-P10.png

  • Resolution of maplets MapResP10.jpg

  • Number of images in a maplet imgNo1.jpg imgNo2.jpg

  • MAPINFO's residuals (col 9) for each maplet mapErr.jpg

--


General info about error -- as I try to figure out what is best to use

RESIDUALS

  • img x, y val val
  • overlap x, y val val
  • img x, y val val
    • The 1st column is a list of 1. IMAGEFILES included in the landmark 2. overlaps with other landmarks 3. Limbs
    • The 2nd column is the error in deltaX (# pixels in image resolution)
    • The 3rd column is the error in deltaY (# pixels in image resolution)
    • The 4th column is the magnitude of the error (combines deltaX and deltaY)
    • The 5th column is the error in physical units (km)
  • .........................
  • name val
    • (Bottom)
      • Meter resolution, difference between predicted and actual
    • (Very bottom)
      • Observations how many things RMS Residual (m) (vector residual)


MAPINFO.TXT name ........ val val

  • col 9 formal uncertainty in meters of the landmark position
  • col 10 Flag
  • ">>" Flag showing landmarks that are below the pixel threshold. You might want to look at.

  • "**" Fewer than 3 images
  • col 11 Residual in meters of the nominals and position


PICINFO.TXT name ....... val dx, dy, dz dCx, dCy, dCz

  • Col 7 - Pixel residual (RMS in pixels)

Error_evaluation (last edited 2016-07-21 13:56:36 by EricPalmer)