Test nn: OptimalF2

Purpose of test: To obtain highest possible topographic accuracy and resolution for TAG site 1, given perfect camera position and pointing and optimal SPC image suite.

Data

The following TAG1 bigmaps were tiled and evaluated:

Results

RMS Distance (cm) - Compare OBJ

Resolution (cm)

Step

Diane

Eric

John

Kris

Tanner

35

35cm-Tiling

7.06

7.06

8.35

35

35cm-Iteration 1

6.95

7.15

8.49

35

35cm-Iteration 2

11.51

7.15

7.13

7.44

8.58

35

35cm-Iteration 3

11.76

7.6

7.44

35

35cm-Iteration 4

11.85

8.04

9.10

35

35cm-Iteration 5

11.31

7.57

11.05

35

35cm-Iteration 6

8.81

13.39

18

18cm-Tiling

8.78

5.43

8.79

6.49

18

18cm-Iteration 1

8.62

8.12

6.29

9.37

6.50

18

18cm-Iteration 2

8.57

7.45

10.60

6.58

18

18cm-Iteration 3

8.57

18

18cm-Iteration 4

8.56

18

18cm-Iteration 5

8.55

18

18cm-Iteration 6

8.54

9

9cm-Tiling

5.47

6.00

8.49

4.98

9

9cm-Iteration 1

5.28

7.39

9.80

4.92

9

9cm-Iteration 2

5.27

9.15

4.92

5

5cm-Tiling

7.68

4.47

5

5cm-Iteration 1

12.31

4.44

5

5cm-Iteration 2

4.45

OptimalRMS-resized.png

Formal Uncertainty (cm) - RESIDUALS

Resolution (cm)

Step

Diane

Eric

John

Kris

Tanner

35

35cm-Tiling

5.48

5.49

35

35cm-Iteration 1

6.32

6.91

35

35cm-Iteration 2

29.78

4.76

5.36

5.72

35

35cm-Iteration 3

39.12

4.71

5.45

35

35cm-Iteration 4

14.74

4.87

5.98

35

35cm-Iteration 5

12.69

5.04

6.72

35

35cm-Iteration 6

5.23

7.51

18

18cm-Tiling

8.78

9.17

3.12

5.11

4.34

18

18cm-Iteration 1

7.90

2.97

3.98

4.45

18

18cm-Iteration 2

7.23

3.33

3.98

4.22

18

18cm-Iteration 3

6.84

18

18cm-Iteration 4

6.61

18

18cm-Iteration 5

6.47

18

18cm-Iteration 6

6.40

9

9cm-Tiling

3.82

2.24

2.86

2.54

9

9cm-Iteration 1

3.53

2.57

2.99

2.46

9

9cm-Iteration 2

3.18

3.01

2.26

5

5cm-Tiling

2.99

1.59

5

5cm-Iteration 1

3.97

1.43

5

5cm-Iteration 2

1.35

OptimalResidual-resized.png

35cm Maplets - 50cm Resolution Images MTAG15-35cmMaplets.jpg