Differences between revisions 3 and 5 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 3 as of 2012-03-15 12:42:45
Size: 359
Editor: EricPalmer
Comment:
Revision 5 as of 2012-03-16 12:10:57
Size: 825
Editor: EricPalmer
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 4: Line 4:
    -- 50 meters + 25%
Line 5: Line 7:
    -- fill, does better resolution
Line 9: Line 13:

 *What is a good way to output a DEM in the form of a DEM (png, binary, ascii)

1/64th works out into 68 meters and higher at higher latitudes
S. Pole map is at 25 meter resolution

SpheremapB - DTEM and shaded relief
-- raw and pgm, 16bit unsigned short (which is in the header)
-- takes bigmaps and makes a large map (either orthograthic, stereo, equrect)
    option C, equatrangular

Questions to ask here.

  • What is the math for the resolution and scale parameters.
    • -- 50 meters + 25%
  • How do I increase the resolution of a big map (aka do more processing), especially how to remove bands
    • -- fill, does better resolution
  • Have you uploaded the LAMO images yet?
  • Can you upload your new maplets/landmarks (via rsync if possible)
  • Any more work on Tislovsky? (better than 5 meter)
  • What is a good way to output a DEM in the form of a DEM (png, binary, ascii)

1/64th works out into 68 meters and higher at higher latitudes S. Pole map is at 25 meter resolution

SpheremapB - DTEM and shaded relief -- raw and pgm, 16bit unsigned short (which is in the header) -- takes bigmaps and makes a large map (either orthograthic, stereo, equrect)

  • option C, equatrangular

Questions_to_ask (last edited 2015-05-06 11:15:25 by localhost)