|
Size: 287
Comment:
|
Size: 2089
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| ## page was renamed from Comparison | |
| Line 2: | Line 3: |
|| Name || Sun || S/C Az || S/C Zenith || RMS w/trans || || Test11S || 45, 0, -45 || every 45 || 0, 30, 60 || || || Test11T || 45, 0, -45 || every 45 || 0, 20, 40, 60, 80 || || || Test11U || 45, 0, -45 || every 45 || 0, 14, 30, 45, 60, 75 || || == Discussion == The measures of accuracy are plotted for each test in figures ?? to ?? under Tables and Figures (below). '''Figure 1: Minima''' {{attachment:Minima-resized.png}} Figure 1 illustrates the minimum uncertainty and RMSs for each test, and at which iteration each minimum occurs. The following patterns are apparent: * Test U achieves the minimum value for every measure in the least number of iterations: 5 to 15 iterations sooner than Test T; and 15 to 20 iterations sooner than Test S (excluding Test S - CompMapVec RMS). * Test S consistently gives the largest RMS but the smallest formal uncertainty. * CompareOBJ RMS (with and without optimal translation and rotation varies across tests by less than 0.2cm, although Test U consistently archives the minimum RMS in significantly fewer iterations. == Tables and Figures == |
|
| Line 5: | Line 26: |
| {{attachment:FormalUncertainty-resized.png}} | |
| Line 9: | Line 30: |
| {{attachment:CompMapVec-resized.png}} | |
| Line 13: | Line 34: |
| {{attachment:CompareOBJRMS-resized.png}} | |
| Line 17: | Line 38: |
| {{attachment:CompOBJwOptTranRot-resized.png}} | |
| Line 21: | Line 42: |
| {{attachment:transitIt20200.png}} {{attachment:transitIt40200.png}} |
|
| Line 25: | Line 47: |
| {{attachment:transposedTransitIt20200.png}} {{attachment:transposedTransitIt40200.png}} |
|
| Line 28: | Line 51: |
{{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFS-05stepB020-1cm-4m.png}} {{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFT-05stepB020-1cm-4m.png}} {{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB020-1cm-4m.png}} {{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFS-05stepB040-1cm-4m.png}} {{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFT-05stepB040-1cm-4m.png}} {{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB040-1cm-4m.png}} |
Spacecraft Zenith Variations: Comparison of Results
Name |
Sun |
S/C Az |
S/C Zenith |
RMS w/trans |
Test11S |
45, 0, -45 |
every 45 |
0, 30, 60 |
|
Test11T |
45, 0, -45 |
every 45 |
0, 20, 40, 60, 80 |
|
Test11U |
45, 0, -45 |
every 45 |
0, 14, 30, 45, 60, 75 |
|
Discussion
The measures of accuracy are plotted for each test in figures ?? to ?? under Tables and Figures (below).
Figure 1: Minima
Figure 1 illustrates the minimum uncertainty and RMSs for each test, and at which iteration each minimum occurs. The following patterns are apparent:
Test U achieves the minimum value for every measure in the least number of iterations: 5 to 15 iterations sooner than Test T; and 15 to 20 iterations sooner than Test S (excluding Test S - CompMapVec RMS).
- Test S consistently gives the largest RMS but the smallest formal uncertainty.
- CompareOBJ RMS (with and without optimal translation and rotation varies across tests by less than 0.2cm, although Test U consistently archives the minimum RMS in significantly fewer iterations.
Tables and Figures
Formal Uncertainty
CompMapVec RMS
CompareOBJ RMS
CompareOBJ With Opt Tran & Rot
Traces Running North_South
Traces Running West-East
Heat Plots
