|
Size: 287
Comment:
|
Size: 2180
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| = Spacecraft Zenith Variations: Comparison of Results = | ## page was renamed from Test11STU Comparative Results ## page was renamed from Spacecraft Zenith Variations ## page was renamed from Comparison = Spacecraft Zenith Variations = == Test Over11 S/T/U Comparative Results == The measures of accuracy are plotted for each test in figures ?? to ?? under Tables and Figures (below). Figure 1 illustrates the minimum uncertainty and RMSs for each test, and at which iteration each minimum occurs. The following patterns are apparent: * Test U achieves either the minimum value or within 0.03 cm of the minimum value for every RMS measure in the least number of iterations: 5 to 15 iterations sooner than Test T; and 15 to 20 iterations sooner than Test S (excluding Test S - CompMapVec RMS). * Test S consistently gives the largest RMS, with CompMapVec RMS showing no improvement from iterating. * CompareOBJ RMS (with and without optimal translation and rotation varies across tests by less than 0.2cm. * Residuals maintain a value of approx. 3.1cm through the first 13 iterations, then decrease through the remainder of the first 50 iterations, seemingly forming an asymptote at approximately 1.4cm after approximately 55 iterations. == Tables and Figures == '''Figure 1: Minima''' {{attachment:Minima-100-resized.png}} |
| Line 5: | Line 26: |
| {{attachment:FormalUncertainty-resized.png}} | |
| Line 9: | Line 30: |
| {{attachment:CompMapVec-resized.png}} | |
| Line 13: | Line 34: |
| {{attachment:CompareOBJRMS-resized.png}} | |
| Line 17: | Line 38: |
| {{attachment:CompOBJwOptTranRot-resized.png}} | |
| Line 21: | Line 42: |
| {{attachment:transitIt20200.png}} {{attachment:transitIt40200.png}} |
|
| Line 25: | Line 47: |
| {{attachment:transposedTransitIt20200.png}} {{attachment:transposedTransitIt40200.png}} |
|
| Line 28: | Line 51: |
{{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFS-05stepB020-1cm-4m.png}} {{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFT-05stepB020-1cm-4m.png}} {{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB020-1cm-4m.png}} {{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFS-05stepB040-1cm-4m.png}} {{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFT-05stepB040-1cm-4m.png}} {{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB040-1cm-4m.png}} |
Spacecraft Zenith Variations
Test Over11 S/T/U Comparative Results
The measures of accuracy are plotted for each test in figures ?? to ?? under Tables and Figures (below).
Figure 1 illustrates the minimum uncertainty and RMSs for each test, and at which iteration each minimum occurs. The following patterns are apparent:
Test U achieves either the minimum value or within 0.03 cm of the minimum value for every RMS measure in the least number of iterations: 5 to 15 iterations sooner than Test T; and 15 to 20 iterations sooner than Test S (excluding Test S - CompMapVec RMS).
Test S consistently gives the largest RMS, with CompMapVec RMS showing no improvement from iterating.
- CompareOBJ RMS (with and without optimal translation and rotation varies across tests by less than 0.2cm.
- Residuals maintain a value of approx. 3.1cm through the first 13 iterations, then decrease through the remainder of the first 50 iterations, seemingly forming an asymptote at approximately 1.4cm after approximately 55 iterations.
Tables and Figures
Figure 1: Minima
Formal Uncertainty
CompMapVec RMS
CompareOBJ RMS
CompareOBJ With Opt Tran & Rot
Traces Running North_South
Traces Running West-East
Heat Plots
