== SPC Test Wish List ==

Here are the tests that are desired to be done during Phase E

||<#CCffff>  Test ||<#CCffff>  Description ||<#CCffff> Priority ||<#CCffff> Effort ||<#CCffff> Customer ||
||<#ffffcc> Action ||
|| Pole Wobble || Test the new modules that were changed in support of the Rosetta mission to support Pole Wobble. Std error. || Action || 12 weeks prep + 12 weeks || SPOC ||
|| Shape 3 redo || Run Approach phase testing to see if the improved procedures performs as well as test F4 || Action  || 8 weeks || Jackson ||
|| Update code to SPC v3.1 || Incorporate the improvements that Gaskell added to SPC during the Rosetta mission.  Supports pole wobble more effectively || Action || 16 weeks || SPOC ||
|| Max Slope || Do a paremeter study of the impact of the MXSLP variable, currently used for 0.6 || Action || 4 weeks || Jackson ||
|| OLA Albedo Integration  || Work out integration of albedo into OLA || Action || 3 weeks || Lockheed - Lorenz ||
|| Pole and Omega on F4 || Need to run the pole and omega using F4's final shape model.  May need Gaskell to train || Action || 3 weeks || Palmer ||
||<#ffffcc>  High ||
|| FDS Integration || Develop the procedures and run an Approach/PreSurvey test that works on the transition to landmark navigation that contains multiple sets of data being passed || High || 8 weeks || FDS ||
|| Image Quality || Generate a shape model using low(er) quality images that contain PSF, blur, hot pixels and cosmic rays || High || 8 weeks || AltWG ||
|| Asteroid wall || Process Lockheed's asteroid wall || High || 12 weeks || Lockheed ||
|| NFT-SPC Thread Test  || Generate NFT Features and use for Decent to TAG simulation || High || scope is uncertain || Lockheed - Lorenz ||
|| Enhanced Imaging || Develop requirements and imaging plan to support.  Develop high resolution DTM's based upon it || High || 12 weeks || SPOC ||
|| Center of Figure / Center of Mass || SPC can shift the system of coordinates.  FDS needs to have the COF mapped to COM for navigation || High || 14 weeks || FDS ||
||<#ffffcc>  Medium ||
|| Operations Test:  Parallel processing and team || Run Preliminary Survey and Detailed Survey portions of the mission using multiple people and multiple machines || Medium || 8 weeks || SPOC ||
|| Update F2/F3 with Cross Correlation || Recompute the RMS using manually process and a Normalized Cross Correlation || Medium || 5 weeks || Palmer ||
||<#ffffcc>  Low ||
|| || || Low || 2 weeks || Palmer ||
||<#ffffcc>  Must be prioritized ||
|| Dynamics test || Do an evaluation of SCOBJ and PTG with and without the use of dynamics || || 8 weeks || Palmer ||
|| Uncertainty test || See the effect of different amounts of uncertainty in the solution of SPC || || 8 weeks || Palmer ||
|| Have starting model signif different than truth || The existing Shape 4 is only 2 meters different than the Nolan model.  Run a test where we greatly increase the deviation between starting and truth || || 12 weeks || Jackman ||
|| NavCam distortion || Put in camera distortion for the source images and see how well SPC removes it.  This is more needed for NavCam || || 5 weeks || Jackman ||
|| Size vs. speed error || Have a model that has a systematic error so that the size of the model is off.  Then use Gaskell's speed correction analysis to identify and fix a size variation || || 6 weeks || Palmer ||


Anybody want anything else?