Differences between revisions 1 and 6 (spanning 5 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2015-12-04 09:17:23
Size: 453
Editor: JohnWeirich
Comment:
Revision 6 as of 2015-12-04 11:16:29
Size: 627
Editor: JohnWeirich
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 8: Line 8:
 * Image Suite: Optimal flight path, resolutions: 50cm, 20cm, 10cm, 5cm, 1cm, 0.5cm, and 0.2cm.  * Image Suite: Optimal flight path, resolutions: 50cm, 20cm, 10cm, 5cm, 1cm, 0.5cm, and 0.25cm.

Spacecraft:

{{attachment:EE0539_sc_plot.png}}

Sun:

{{attachment:EE0539_sun_plot.png}}

Evaluation Bigmap:
||Name||GSD||Q||Width||
||MMAPL5||0.5cm||200||2m||

MMAPL5 located at -8.858 263.551

Purpose: To test if ultra-high resolution imagery (i.e. 0.2 cm resolution) will improve the solution of shape3 topography (i.e. vertical boulders) and snap the heights of boulders into place.

Data

  • Data was generated by Imager_mg using shape3.8 on ormacsrv1.
  • - Centered at the middle of TAG site one.
  • Image Suite: Optimal flight path, resolutions: 50cm, 20cm, 10cm, 5cm, 1cm, 0.5cm, and 0.25cm.

Spacecraft:

EE0539_sc_plot.png

Sun:

EE0539_sun_plot.png

Evaluation Bigmap:

Name

GSD

Q

Width

MMAPL5

0.5cm

200

2m

MMAPL5 (last edited 2015-12-04 12:00:37 by JohnWeirich)