Differences between revisions 10 and 11
Revision 10 as of 2015-10-18 20:31:19
Size: 2954
Editor: DianeLambert
Comment:
Revision 11 as of 2015-10-18 20:34:32
Size: 3189
Editor: DianeLambert
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 30: Line 30:

Note: For the interim tests, statistics were obtained for the last snapshot of OptimalF2 on the reduced evaluation area. These results show the reduction in RMS and formal uncertainty simply due to reducing the evaluation area.

Test nn: OptimalUltraF2

Purpose of test: To obtain highest possible topographic accuracy and resolution for TAG site 1, given perfect camera position and pointing and optimal SPC image suite. This test is an extension of OptimalF2 with 1cm and 0.5cm resolution images included in the image suite.

Data

  • Data was generated by Imager_mg using shape3.8 on ormacsrv1.
  • PT10A - Centered at the middle of TAG site one.
  • Image Suite: Optimal flight path, resolutions: 50cm, 20cm, 10cm, 5cm, 1cm, 0.5cm.
    • emission
      • Every 20 degrees azimuth, 45 zenith angle
    • incidence
      • 0, 90, 180, 270, 45 zenith angle
      • 135 azimuth, 30 zenith angle

The following TAG1 bigmaps were tiled and evaluated:

Test Step

Activity

Bigmap Resolution

Tiling Resolution

Ground Sample Distance

Bigmap Width

Q size

2p5stepA

Tiling

2.5cm

2cm

N/A

8m

200

2p5stepA

Evaluation

N/A

N/A

0.38cm

0.76m

100

1p25stepA

Tiling

1.25cm

1cm

N/A

4m

200

1p25stepA

Evaluation

N/A

N/A

0.38cm

0.76m

100

0p75stepA

Tiling

0.75cm

0.57cm

N/A

2.3m

200

0p75stepA

Evaluation

N/A

N/A

0.38cm

0.76m

100

0p35stepA

Tiling

0.35cm

0.27cm

N/A

1.1m

200

0p35stepA

Evaluation

N/A

N/A

0.38cm

0.76m

100

Results

RMS Distance (cm) - Compare OBJ

Note: For the interim tests, statistics were obtained for the last snapshot of OptimalF2 on the reduced evaluation area. These results show the reduction in RMS and formal uncertainty simply due to reducing the evaluation area.

Interim

Ultra

Resolution (cm)

Step

Diane

Tanner

Diane

Tanner

9

9cm-Iteration 2

2.55

5

5cm-Iteration 2

1.91

2.5

2.5cm-Tiling

1.22

1.26

2.5

2.5cm-Iteration 1

1.31

1.25

1.25cm-Tiling

1.05

1.25

1.25cm-Iteration 1

1.20

1.25

1.25cm-Iteration 2

1.17

0.75

0.75cm-Tiling

1.08

0.75

0.75cm-Tiling

0.91

OptimalUltraRMS-resized.png

Formal Uncertainty (cm) - RESIDUALS

Interim

Ultra

Resolution (cm)

Step

Diane

Tanner

Diane

Tanner

9

9cm-Iteration 2

5

5cm-Iteration 2

2.5

2.5cm-Tiling

2.44

1.34

2.5

2.5cm-Iteration 1

1.31

1.25

1.25cm-Tiling

2.39

1.25

1.25cm-Iteration 1

2.58

1.25

1.25cm-Iteration 2

2.43

0.75

0.75cm-Tiling

2.38

0.75

0.75cm-Tiling

2.43

OptimalUltraResidual-resized.png

2.5cm GSD Maplets - 5cm Resolution Images

MTAG1U-2.5cmMaplets.jpg

1.25cm GSD Maplets - 5cm Resolution Images

MTAG1U-1.25cmMaplets.jpg

0.75cm GSD Maplets - 1cm Resolution Images

MTAG1U-0.75cmMaplets.jpg

0.35cm GSD Maplets - 0.5cm Resolution Images

MTAG1U-0.35cmMaplets.jpg

OptimalUltraF2 (last edited 2016-05-23 15:40:11 by DianeLambert)