Differences between revisions 1 and 13 (spanning 12 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2015-11-13 14:48:18 →
Size: 1739
Editor: DianeLambert
Comment:
← Revision 13 as of 2015-12-08 10:25:47 → ⇥
Size: 3676
Editor: DianeLambert
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
## page was renamed from Over11U
Line 2: Line 3:
Line 4: Line 6:
Image suite: One 5cm resolution image for each Sun&S/C combination:
 Sun at 45deg, -0, -45deg;

 S/C at every 45deg Azimuth; 0, 14deg, 30deg, 45deg, 60deg, 75deg Zenith.

Model bigmap parameters: GSD = 1cm, Q = 200 (width=4m), centered at REGION.MAP, 966, 1005 (lat, wlong).		 Evaluation bigmap parameters: GSD = 1cm, Q = 200 (width=4m), centered at REGION.MAP, 966, 1005 (pixel/line location).
Line 13: Line 10:
=== Test U - Operator-Induced Loss of Solution ===

The jump in behavior of Test U at iteration 51 is likely due to operator-interference. After 50 iterations an investigation was conducted on one of the maplets which contains the feature, maplet EE0057. During the investigation, the operator opened the landmark within Lithos and loaded the full image suite in order to view the high-emission-angle images. The images were then auto-eliminated as per the iteration sequence. Unfortunately, a comparison of the landmark OOT files between iterations 50 and 51 confirms that the solution degraded in several aspects. The image correlation dropped from 0.9+ to correlations as low as 0.217. The landmark overlap was also broken with EE0057 and EE0075 now showing 'below albedo correlation limit'. Further iteration did not recover these aspects with similar values displayed in the iteration 80 EE0057.OOT file.


== Tables and Figures ==

{{attachment:Over11U-100-resized.png}}
Line 15: Line 21:
||'''CompareOBJ-RMS(cm)'''||'''CompareOBJ-RMS with Opt Trans & Rot (cm)'''||'''CompMapVec-RMS(cm)'''||
||3.379||0.822||1.382||		 ||'''Formal Uncertainty (cm)'''||'''CompareOBJ-RMS(cm)'''||'''CompareOBJ-RMS with Opt Trans & Rot (cm)'''||'''CompMapVec-RMS(cm)'''||
||4.246||3.379||0.822||1.382||
Line 20: Line 26:
||'''CompareOBJ-RMS(cm)'''||'''CompareOBJ-RMS with Opt Trans & Rot (cm)'''||'''CompMapVec-RMS(cm)'''||
||1.294||0.642||1.184||		 ||'''Formal Uncertainty (cm)'''||'''CompareOBJ-RMS(cm)'''||'''CompareOBJ-RMS with Opt Trans & Rot (cm)'''||'''CompMapVec-RMS(cm)'''||
||3.726||1.294||0.642||1.184||
Line 25: Line 31:
||'''Iteration'''||'''CompareOBJ-RMS(cm)'''||'''CompareOBJ-RMS with Opt Trans & Rot (cm)'''||'''CompMapVec-RMS(cm)'''||
||1||1.230||0.803||0.806||
||2||0.976||0.471||1.019||
||3||0.944||0.423||0.958||
||5||0.909||0.386||0.858||
||10||0.905||0.403||0.647||
||15||0.911||0.432||0.586||
||20||
 ||'''Iteration'''||'''Formal Uncertainty (cm)'''||'''CompareOBJ-RMS(cm)'''||'''CompareOBJ-RMS with Opt Trans & Rot (cm)'''||'''CompMapVec-RMS(cm)'''||
||1||3.302||1.230||0.803||0.806||
||2||3.027||0.976||0.471||1.019||
||3||2.794||0.944||0.423||0.958||
||5||3.201||0.909||0.386||0.858||
||10||2.984||0.905||0.403||0.647||
||15||2.930||0.911||0.432||0.586||
||20||2.574||0.934||0.447||0.635||
||25||2.140||0.957||0.459||0.720||
||30||2.039||0.998||0.473||0.879||
||35||1.918||1.069||0.490||1.041||
||40||1.901||1.141||0.508||1.196||
||45||1.748||1.241||0.523||1.364||
||50||1.598||1.333||0.538||1.511||
||60||1.582||1.464||0.690||1.178||
||70||1.525||1.629||0.705||1.044||
||80||1.552||1.776||0.716||0.977||
||90||1.624||1.845||0.718||0.885||
Line 37: Line 52:
'''Traces Running North-South:''' {{attachment:transit200-It1-10.png}}
{{attachment:transposedTransit200-It0-10.png}}
Line 39: Line 55:
{{attachment:transit200.png}} {{attachment:transit200-It10-50.png}}
{{attachment:transposedTransit200-It10-50.png}}
Line 41: Line 58:
'''Traces Running West-East:'''

{{attachment:transposedTransit200.png}}		 {{attachment:transit200-It50-100.png}}
{{attachment:transposedTransit200-It50-100.png}}
Line 48: Line 64:
{{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFT-05stepA-1cm-4m.png}} {{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepA-1cm-4m.png}}
{{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB001-1cm-4m.png}}
{{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB010-1cm-4m.png}}
{{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB020-1cm-4m.png}}
{{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB030-1cm-4m.png}}
{{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB040-1cm-4m.png}}
{{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB050-1cm-4m.png}}
{{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB060-1cm-4m.png}}
{{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB070-1cm-4m.png}}
{{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB080-1cm-4m.png}}
{{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB090-1cm-4m.png}}
{{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB100-1cm-4m.png}}
Line 50: Line 77:
{{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFT-05stepB001-1cm-4m.png}} '''Landmark Display after 2 iterations:'''
Line 52: Line 79:
{{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFT-05stepB010-1cm-4m.png}}

{{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFT-05stepB020-1cm-4m.png}}



'''Landmark Display after 1 iteration:'''

{{attachment:EE0057-It001.jpg}}		 {{attachment:EE0057_It02.jpg}}
Line 65: Line 84:
{{attachment:EE0057-It010.jpg}} {{attachment:EE0057_It10.jpg}}
Line 70: Line 89:
{{attachment:EE0057-It020.jpg}} {{attachment:EE0057_It20.jpg}}

Test 11U - With Overlaps

Truth topography: flat-topped cone with 20deg slope within a landscape of cones and craters.

Evaluation bigmap parameters: GSD = 1cm, Q = 200 (width=4m), centered at REGION.MAP, 966, 1005 (pixel/line location).

Results

Test U - Operator-Induced Loss of Solution

The jump in behavior of Test U at iteration 51 is likely due to operator-interference. After 50 iterations an investigation was conducted on one of the maplets which contains the feature, maplet EE0057. During the investigation, the operator opened the landmark within Lithos and loaded the full image suite in order to view the high-emission-angle images. The images were then auto-eliminated as per the iteration sequence. Unfortunately, a comparison of the landmark OOT files between iterations 50 and 51 confirms that the solution degraded in several aspects. The image correlation dropped from 0.9+ to correlations as low as 0.217. The landmark overlap was also broken with EE0057 and EE0075 now showing 'below albedo correlation limit'. Further iteration did not recover these aspects with similar values displayed in the iteration 80 EE0057.OOT file.

Tables and Figures

Over11U-100-resized.png

10cm Tiling:

Formal Uncertainty (cm)

CompareOBJ-RMS(cm)

CompareOBJ-RMS with Opt Trans & Rot (cm)

CompMapVec-RMS(cm)

4.246

3.379

0.822

1.382

5cm Tiling:

Formal Uncertainty (cm)

CompareOBJ-RMS(cm)

CompareOBJ-RMS with Opt Trans & Rot (cm)

CompMapVec-RMS(cm)

3.726

1.294

0.642

1.184

5cm Iterations:

Iteration

Formal Uncertainty (cm)

CompareOBJ-RMS(cm)

CompareOBJ-RMS with Opt Trans & Rot (cm)

CompMapVec-RMS(cm)

1

3.302

1.230

0.803

0.806

2

3.027

0.976

0.471

1.019

3

2.794

0.944

0.423

0.958

5

3.201

0.909

0.386

0.858

10

2.984

0.905

0.403

0.647

15

2.930

0.911

0.432

0.586

20

2.574

0.934

0.447

0.635

25

2.140

0.957

0.459

0.720

30

2.039

0.998

0.473

0.879

35

1.918

1.069

0.490

1.041

40

1.901

1.141

0.508

1.196

45

1.748

1.241

0.523

1.364

50

1.598

1.333

0.538

1.511

60

1.582

1.464

0.690

1.178

70

1.525

1.629

0.705

1.044

80

1.552

1.776

0.716

0.977

90

1.624

1.845

0.718

0.885

Center Traces:

transit200-It1-10.png transposedTransit200-It0-10.png

transit200-It10-50.png transposedTransit200-It10-50.png

transit200-It50-100.png transposedTransit200-It50-100.png

CompMapVec RMS HeatMaps:

heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepA-1cm-4m.png heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB001-1cm-4m.png heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB010-1cm-4m.png heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB020-1cm-4m.png heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB030-1cm-4m.png heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB040-1cm-4m.png heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB050-1cm-4m.png heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB060-1cm-4m.png heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB070-1cm-4m.png heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB080-1cm-4m.png heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB090-1cm-4m.png heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB100-1cm-4m.png

Landmark Display after 2 iterations:

EE0057_It02.jpg

Landmark Display after 10 iterations:

EE0057_It10.jpg

Landmark Display after 20 iterations:

Test Over11U Results (last edited 2015-12-21 10:18:30 by DianeLambert)