Differences between revisions 2 and 10 (spanning 8 versions)
Revision 2 as of 2015-11-24 10:09:13
Size: 613
Editor: JohnWeirich
Comment:
Revision 10 as of 2016-01-05 11:32:35
Size: 1111
Editor: JohnWeirich
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
'''Purpose of test:''' Autoiteration was not creating accurate boulders. The boulder was fuzzy, and there was actually a depression where the boulder was located. We wanted to see the effect of tiling over a large boulder by hand. '''Purpose of test:''' Standard procedure was not creating accurate boulders (see transit below). The boulder was fuzzy, and there was actually a depression where the boulder was located. We wanted to see the effect of tiling over a large boulder (5-10m high) by hand.

{{attachment:boulder.png}}
Purple is truth, green is model
Line 12: Line 15:
'''Data''' Approach and Detailed Survey images of Shape 3.7. '''Data'''
Approach and Detailed Survey images of Shape 3.7.
Line 15: Line 19:

== Discussion ==
 We tiled at higher and higher GSD, but we were not able to get to a high enough GSD to properly represent the boulder. The image pixel size was just not high enough to support the small maplets needed to properly represent the boulder.
Line 19: Line 22:

== Tables and Figures ==
 If we want to accurately represent these large boulders, we will need better images. This may require additional image planning during the mission if we need to properly represent these large boulders.

Test 01: First Boulder

Aim and Objectives

Purpose of test: Standard procedure was not creating accurate boulders (see transit below). The boulder was fuzzy, and there was actually a depression where the boulder was located. We wanted to see the effect of tiling over a large boulder (5-10m high) by hand.

boulder.png Purple is truth, green is model

Additional Objectives

  • This was our first attempt at tiling by hand, so we were gaining experience with special cases.

Methodology

Data

  • Approach and Detailed Survey images of Shape 3.7.

Results

  • We tiled at higher and higher GSD, but we were not able to get to a high enough GSD to properly represent the boulder. The image pixel size was just not high enough to support the small maplets needed to properly represent the boulder.

Conclusions and Recommendations

  • If we want to accurately represent these large boulders, we will need better images. This may require additional image planning during the mission if we need to properly represent these large boulders.

FirstBoulder (last edited 2016-01-05 12:02:36 by JohnWeirich)