|
Size: 2968
Comment:
|
Size: 1560
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 21: | Line 21: |
Note that a larger image suite was planned and produced than was utilized during test. The images for a number of planned viewing conditions were eliminated due to image quality related to the viewing conditions being unfit for SPC. For further details are contained here: [[Test11STU Unfit Viewing Conditions]]. |
|
| Line 71: | Line 73: |
The measures of accuracy are plotted for each test in figures ?? to ?? under Tables and Figures (below). '''Figure 1: Minima''' {{attachment:Minima-resized.png}} Figure 1 illustrates the minimum uncertainty and RMSs for each test, and at which iteration each minimum occurs. The following patterns are apparent: * Test U achieves the minimum value for every measure in the least number of iterations: 5 to 15 iterations sooner than Test T; and 15 to 20 iterations sooner than Test S (excluding Test S - CompMapVec RMS). * Test S consistently gives the largest RMS but the smallest formal uncertainty. * CompareOBJ RMS (with and without optimal translation and rotation varies across tests by less than 0.2cm, although Test U consistently archives the minimum RMS in significantly fewer iterations. == Tables and Figures == '''Formal Uncertainty''' {{attachment:FormalUncertainty-resized.png}} '''CompMapVec RMS''' {{attachment:CompMapVec-resized.png}} '''CompareOBJ RMS''' {{attachment:CompareOBJRMS-resized.png}} '''CompareOBJ With Opt Tran & Rot''' {{attachment:CompOBJwOptTranRot-resized.png}} '''Traces Running North_South''' {{attachment:transitIt20200.png}} {{attachment:transitIt40200.png}} '''Traces Running West-East''' {{attachment:transposedTransitIt20200.png}} {{attachment:transposedTransitIt40200.png}} '''Heat Plots''' {{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFS-05stepB020-1cm-4m.png}} {{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFT-05stepB020-1cm-4m.png}} {{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB020-1cm-4m.png}} {{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFS-05stepB040-1cm-4m.png}} {{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFT-05stepB040-1cm-4m.png}} {{attachment:heatPlot-T11RFU-05stepB040-1cm-4m.png}} |
Spacecraft Zenith Variations
Aim and Objectives
Purpose of test: .
Additional Objectives
- .
Methodology
Data
- Data was generated by .
- Location and parameters for evaluation area.
- Image Suite: Image resolutions: 50cm, 20cm, 10cm, 5cm.
- emission
- .
- incidence
- .
- .
- emission
Note that a larger image suite was planned and produced than was utilized during test. The images for a number of planned viewing conditions were eliminated due to image quality related to the viewing conditions being unfit for SPC. For further details are contained here: Test11STU Unfit Viewing Conditions.
Name |
Sun |
S/C Az |
S/C Zenith |
|
Test11S |
45, 0, -45 |
every 45 |
0, 30, 60 |
|
Test11T |
45, 0, -45 |
every 45 |
0, 20, 40, 60, 80 |
|
Test11U |
45, 0, -45 |
every 45 |
0, 14, 30, 45, 60, 75 |
|
Spacecraft:
Sun:
Bigmaps
The following TAG1 bigmaps were tiled/iterated and evaluated:
Starting topography defined from: ?
Step |
GSD |
Overlap Ratio |
Q Size |
Width |
35cm-Tiling |
||||
18cm-Tiling |
||||
9cm-Tiling |
||||
5cm-Tiling |
Iteration Parameters
Reset albedo/slopes: ?YES
Calculate Central Vector: ?YES
Differential Stereo: ?YES
Shadows: ?NO
Results