Differences between revisions 2 and 3
Revision 2 as of 2015-11-24 17:50:22
Size: 1244
Editor: DianeLambert
Comment:
Revision 3 as of 2015-11-24 17:53:50
Size: 1560
Editor: DianeLambert
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 21: Line 21:

Note that a larger image suite was planned and produced than was utilized during test. The images for a number of planned viewing conditions were eliminated due to image quality related to the viewing conditions being unfit for SPC. For further details are contained here: [[Test11STU Unfit Viewing Conditions]].

Spacecraft Zenith Variations

Aim and Objectives

Purpose of test: .

Additional Objectives

  • .

Methodology

Data

  • Data was generated by .
  • Location and parameters for evaluation area.
  • Image Suite: Image resolutions: 50cm, 20cm, 10cm, 5cm.
    • emission
      • .
    • incidence
      • .
      • .

Note that a larger image suite was planned and produced than was utilized during test. The images for a number of planned viewing conditions were eliminated due to image quality related to the viewing conditions being unfit for SPC. For further details are contained here: Test11STU Unfit Viewing Conditions.

Name

Sun

S/C Az

S/C Zenith

Test11S

45, 0, -45

every 45

0, 30, 60

Test11T

45, 0, -45

every 45

0, 20, 40, 60, 80

Test11U

45, 0, -45

every 45

0, 14, 30, 45, 60, 75

Spacecraft:

Sun:

Bigmaps

The following TAG1 bigmaps were tiled/iterated and evaluated:

Starting topography defined from: ?

Step

GSD

Overlap Ratio

Q Size

Width

35cm-Tiling

18cm-Tiling

9cm-Tiling

5cm-Tiling

Iteration Parameters

Reset albedo/slopes: ?YES

Calculate Central Vector: ?YES

Differential Stereo: ?YES

Shadows: ?NO

Results

Test11STU Comparative Results

Test11S Results

Test11T Results

Test11U Results

Discussion

Spacecraft Zenith Variations (last edited 2015-12-16 16:48:31 by DianeLambert)