Test11J:
Building topography with s/c azimuth every 90deg and 5cm images.
Results Summary:
After 10 or so iterations the maplet isn't changing much. The RMS continues to improve, mostly due to vertical displacement, but the representation of the boulder hasn't really changed much. Also note that at step07 I also did a global shift since the center had wandered, which also improved the RMS.
RMS values:
Name |
CompareOBJ(cm) |
CompMapVec(cm) |
Notes |
step01 |
22.1 |
20.6 |
aligned by hand |
step02 |
20.1 |
18.8 |
|
step03 |
18.6 |
17.2 |
|
step05 |
16.3 |
15.3 |
|
step06 |
15.4 |
14.6 |
autoalign |
step07 |
13.1 |
11.0 |
aligned by hand again |
step08 |
12.6 |
10.6 |
|
step10 |
11.9 |
10.1 |
|
step15 |
10.6 |
8.89 |
|
step20 |
9.80 |
7.50 |
|
step25 |
8.97 |
6.45 |
|
step30 |
8.60 |
5.94 |
|
step40 |
8.14 |
6.04 |
|
step41 |
8.11 |
5.91 |
start autoalign |
step45 |
6.04 |
2.82 |
|
step50 |
5.94 |
2.79 |
|
step60 |
5.97 |
3.03 |
|
step70 |
5.95 |
2.73 |
used x .025 |
Traces:
step01 
step02 
step03 
step05 
step06 
step07 
step08 
step10 
step15 
step20 
step25 
step30 
step40 
step45 
step50 
step60 
step70 
Landmark Display:
step01 
step70 