Differences between revisions 1 and 24 (spanning 23 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2015-10-15 09:06:51
Size: 9
Editor: JohnWeirich
Comment:
Revision 24 as of 2015-10-15 10:19:34
Size: 2044
Editor: JohnWeirich
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
Test11J =Test11J:= Building topography with s/c azimuth every 90deg and 5cm images.

=Results Summary:= After 10 or so iterations the maplet isn't changing much. The RMS continues to improve, mostly due to vertical displacement, but the representation of the boulder hasn't really changed much. Also note that at step07 I also did a global shift since the center had wandered, which also improved the RMS.

RMS values:
||Name ||CompareOBJ(km) ||CompMapVec(m) ||Notes ||
||step01 ||2.209835378632664E-4 ||0.20690918 ||aligned by hand ||
||step02 ||2.0143047188757188E-4 ||0.18771362 ||
||step03 ||1.8558531494299336E-4 ||0.17254639 ||
||step05 ||1.631007268882834E-4 ||0.15335083 ||
||step06 ||1.5442675388843122E-4 ||0.14645386 ||autoalign ||
||step07 ||1.3048433036285282E-4 ||0.10992432 ||aligned by hand again ||
||step08 ||1.2619155776245273E-4 ||0.10601807 ||
||step10 ||1.1936819572355717E-4 ||0.10110474 ||
||step15 ||1.0638313036840408E-4 ||8.88977051E-02 ||
||step20 ||9.796714479057133E-5 ||7.50427246E-02 ||
||step25 ||8.970664899918905E-5 ||6.45141602E-02 ||
||step30 ||8.599809374058143E-5 ||5.93566895E-02 ||
||step40 ||8.135536389470144E-5 ||6.03637695E-02 ||
||step41 ||8.112512285576559E-5 ||5.91125488E-02 ||start autoalign ||
||step45 ||6.035823367187582E-5 ||2.81982422E-02 ||
||step50 ||5.942584280874431E-5 ||2.78930664E-02 ||
||step60 ||5.973241185121065E-5 ||3.03039551E-02 ||
||step70 ||5.94693109905866E-5 ||2.73437500E-02 ||used x .025 ||




step01{{attachment:step1.png}}
step02{{attachment:step2.png}}
step03{{attachment:step3.png}}
step05{{attachment:step5.png}}
step06{{attachment:step6.png}}
step07{{attachment:step7.png}}
step08{{attachment:step8.png}}
step10{{attachment:step10.png}}
step15{{attachment:step15.png}}
step20{{attachment:step20.png}}
step25{{attachment:step25.png}}
step30{{attachment:step30.png}}
step40{{attachment:step40.png}}
step45{{attachment:step45.png}}
step50{{attachment:step50.png}}
step60{{attachment:step60.png}}
step70{{attachment:step70.png}}

=Test11J:= Building topography with s/c azimuth every 90deg and 5cm images.

=Results Summary:= After 10 or so iterations the maplet isn't changing much. The RMS continues to improve, mostly due to vertical displacement, but the representation of the boulder hasn't really changed much. Also note that at step07 I also did a global shift since the center had wandered, which also improved the RMS.

RMS values:

Name

CompareOBJ(km)

CompMapVec(m)

Notes

step01

2.209835378632664E-4

0.20690918

aligned by hand

step02

2.0143047188757188E-4

0.18771362

step03

1.8558531494299336E-4

0.17254639

step05

1.631007268882834E-4

0.15335083

step06

1.5442675388843122E-4

0.14645386

autoalign

step07

1.3048433036285282E-4

0.10992432

aligned by hand again

step08

1.2619155776245273E-4

0.10601807

step10

1.1936819572355717E-4

0.10110474

step15

1.0638313036840408E-4

8.88977051E-02

step20

9.796714479057133E-5

7.50427246E-02

step25

8.970664899918905E-5

6.45141602E-02

step30

8.599809374058143E-5

5.93566895E-02

step40

8.135536389470144E-5

6.03637695E-02

step41

8.112512285576559E-5

5.91125488E-02

start autoalign

step45

6.035823367187582E-5

2.81982422E-02

step50

5.942584280874431E-5

2.78930664E-02

step60

5.973241185121065E-5

3.03039551E-02

step70

5.94693109905866E-5

2.73437500E-02

used x .025

step01step1.png step02step2.png step03step3.png step05step5.png step06step6.png step07step7.png step08step8.png step10step10.png step15step15.png step20step20.png step25step25.png step30step30.png step40step40.png step45step45.png step50step50.png step60step60.png step70step70.png

Test11J (last edited 2015-10-23 10:09:18 by JohnWeirich)