Differences between revisions 27 and 31 (spanning 4 versions)

Test11J:

Building topography with s/c azimuth every 90deg and 5cm images.

Results Summary:

After 10 or so iterations the maplet isn't changing much. The RMS continues to improve, mostly due to vertical displacement, but the representation of the boulder hasn't really changed much. Also note that at step07 I also did a global shift since the center had wandered, which also improved the RMS.

RMS values:

Name	CompareOBJ(km)	CompMapVec(m)	Notes
step01	2.209835378632664E-4	0.20690918	aligned by hand
step02	2.0143047188757188E-4	0.18771362
step03	1.8558531494299336E-4	0.17254639
step05	1.631007268882834E-4	0.15335083
step06	1.5442675388843122E-4	0.14645386	autoalign
step07	1.3048433036285282E-4	0.10992432	aligned by hand again
step08	1.2619155776245273E-4	0.10601807
step10	1.1936819572355717E-4	0.10110474
step15	1.0638313036840408E-4	8.88977051E-02
step20	9.796714479057133E-5	7.50427246E-02
step25	8.970664899918905E-5	6.45141602E-02
step30	8.599809374058143E-5	5.93566895E-02
step40	8.135536389470144E-5	6.03637695E-02
step41	8.112512285576559E-5	5.91125488E-02	start autoalign
step45	6.035823367187582E-5	2.81982422E-02
step50	5.942584280874431E-5	2.78930664E-02
step60	5.973241185121065E-5	3.03039551E-02
step70	5.94693109905866E-5	2.73437500E-02	used x .025

Traces:

step01 step02 step03 step05 step06 step07 step08 step10 step15 step20 step25 step30 step40 step45 step50 step60 step70

Landmark Display:

step01

-  ⇤ ← Revision 27 as of 2015-10-15 10:23:42 → 
  Size: 2115
  Editor: JohnWeirich
  Comment:
+   ← Revision 31 as of 2015-10-15 10:25:16 → ⇥
  Size: 2128
  Editor: JohnWeirich
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 1:
-=Test11J:= Building topography with s/c azimuth every 90deg and 5cm images.
+= Test11J: =
Building topography with s/c azimuth every 90deg and 5cm images.
-Line 3:
+Line 4:
-=Results Summary:= After 10 or so iterations the maplet isn't changing much. The RMS continues to improve, mostly due to vertical displacement, but the representation of the boulder hasn't really changed much. Also note that at step07 I also did a global shift since the center had wandered, which also improved the RMS.
+= Results Summary: =
After 10 or so iterations the maplet isn't changing much. The RMS continues to improve, mostly due to vertical displacement, but the representation of the boulder hasn't really changed much. Also note that at step07 I also did a global shift since the center had wandered, which also improved the RMS.
-Line 5:
+Line 7:
-RMS values:
+= RMS values: =
-Line 27:
+Line 29:
+= Traces: =
-Line 28:
+Line 31:
+step01 {{attachment:step1.png}} step02 {{attachment:step2.png}} step03 {{attachment:step3.png}} step05 {{attachment:step5.png}} step06 {{attachment:step6.png}} step07 {{attachment:step7.png}} step08 {{attachment:step8.png}} step10 {{attachment:step10.png}} step15 {{attachment:step15.png}} step20 {{attachment:step20.png}} step25 {{attachment:step25.png}} step30 {{attachment:step30.png}} step40 {{attachment:step40.png}} step45 {{attachment:step45.png}} step50 {{attachment:step50.png}} step60 {{attachment:step60.png}} step70 {{attachment:step70.png}}
-Line 29:
+Line 33:
-=Traces:= step01 {{attachment:step1.png}} step02 {{attachment:step2.png}} step03 {{attachment:step3.png}} step05 {{attachment:step5.png}} step06 {{attachment:step6.png}} step07 {{attachment:step7.png}} step08 {{attachment:step8.png}} step10 {{attachment:step10.png}} step15 {{attachment:step15.png}} step20 {{attachment:step20.png}} step25 {{attachment:step25.png}} step30 {{attachment:step30.png}} step40 {{attachment:step40.png}} step45 {{attachment:step45.png}} step50 {{attachment:step50.png}} step60 {{attachment:step60.png}} step70 {{attachment:step70.png}}

=Landmark Display:=
+= Landmark Display: =