|
Size: 2829
Comment:
|
Size: 3215
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 5: | Line 5: |
| ||<#CCffff> Test ||<#CCffff> Description ||<#CCffff> Priority ||<#CCffff> Customer || | ||<#CCffff> Test ||<#CCffff> Description ||<#CCffff> Priority ||<#CCffff> Effort ||<#CCffff> Customer || |
| Line 7: | Line 7: |
| || Pole Wobble || Test the new modules that were changed in support of the Rosetta mission to support Pole Wobble. Std error. || Action || SPOC || || Shape 3 redo || Run Approach phase testing to see if the improved procedures performs as well as test F4 || Action || Jackson || || Max Slope || Do a paremeter study of the impact of the MXSLP variable, currently used for 0.6 || Action || Jackson || |
|| Pole Wobble || Test the new modules that were changed in support of the Rosetta mission to support Pole Wobble. Std error. || Action || || 12 weeks prep + 12 weeks || SPOC || || Shape 3 redo || Run Approach phase testing to see if the improved procedures performs as well as test F4 || Action || 8 weeks || Jackson || || Max Slope || Do a paremeter study of the impact of the MXSLP variable, currently used for 0.6 || Action || 4 weeks || Jackson || |
| Line 11: | Line 11: |
| || Pole and Omega on F4 || Need to run the pole and omega using F4's final shape model. May need Gaskell to train || Action || Palmer || | || Pole and Omega on F4 || Need to run the pole and omega using F4's final shape model. May need Gaskell to train || Action || 2 weeks || Palmer || |
| Line 13: | Line 13: |
| || FDS Integration || Develop the procedures and run an Approach/PreSurvey test that works on the transition to landmark navigation that contains multiple sets of data being passed || High || FDS || || Image Quality || Generate a shape model using low(er) quality images that contain PSF, blur, hot pixels and cosmic rays || High || AltWG || || Asteroid wall || Process Lockheed's asteroid wall || High || Lockheed || || NFT-SPC Thread Test || Generate NFT Features and use for Decent to TAG simulation || High || Lockheed - Lorenz || |
|| FDS Integration || Develop the procedures and run an Approach/PreSurvey test that works on the transition to landmark navigation that contains multiple sets of data being passed || High || 8 weeks || FDS || || Image Quality || Generate a shape model using low(er) quality images that contain PSF, blur, hot pixels and cosmic rays || High || 8 weeks || AltWG || || Asteroid wall || Process Lockheed's asteroid wall || High || 12 weeks || Lockheed || || NFT-SPC Thread Test || Generate NFT Features and use for Decent to TAG simulation || High || scope is uncertain || Lockheed - Lorenz || || Enhanced Imaging || Develop requirements and imaging plan to support. Develop high resolution DTM's based upon it || High || 12 weeks || SPOC || |
| Line 18: | Line 19: |
| || Operations Test: Parallel processing and team || Run Preliminary Survey and Detailed Survey portions of the mission using multiple people and multiple machines || Medium || SPOC || || Update F2/F3 with Cross Correlation || Recompute the RMS using manually process and a Normalized Cross Correlation || Medium || Palmer || |
|| Operations Test: Parallel processing and team || Run Preliminary Survey and Detailed Survey portions of the mission using multiple people and multiple machines || Medium || 8 weeks || SPOC || || Update F2/F3 with Cross Correlation || Recompute the RMS using manually process and a Normalized Cross Correlation || Medium || 3 weeks || Palmer || |
| Line 21: | Line 22: |
| || Wiki version || Update Wiki with version number on all modules || Low || Palmer || || Go to Tahiti || Need a vacation || Low -- never going to happen || Palmer || |
|| Wiki version || Update Wiki with version number on all modules || Low || 2 weeks || Palmer || || Go to Tahiti || Need a vacation || Low -- never going to happen || 0 weeks || Palmer || |
| Line 24: | Line 25: |
| || Dynamics test || Do an evaluation of SCOBJ and PTG with and without the use of dynamics || Palmer || || || Uncertainty test || See the effect of different amounts of uncertainty in the solution of SPC || Palmer || || || Have starting model signif different than truth || The existing Shape 4 is only 2 meters different than the Nolan model. Run a test where we greatly increase the deviation between starting and truth || Jackman || || || NavCam distortion || Put in camera distortion for the source images and see how well SPC removes it. This is more needed for NavCam || Jackman || || || Size vs. speed error || Have a model that has a systematic error so that the size of the model is off. Then use Gaskell's speed correction analysis to identify and fix a size variation || Palmer || || |
|| Dynamics test || Do an evaluation of SCOBJ and PTG with and without the use of dynamics || || 4 weeks || Palmer || || Uncertainty test || See the effect of different amounts of uncertainty in the solution of SPC || || 4 weeks || Palmer || || Have starting model signif different than truth || The existing Shape 4 is only 2 meters different than the Nolan model. Run a test where we greatly increase the deviation between starting and truth || || 12 weeks || Jackman || || NavCam distortion || Put in camera distortion for the source images and see how well SPC removes it. This is more needed for NavCam || || 5 weeks || Jackman || || Size vs. speed error || Have a model that has a systematic error so that the size of the model is off. Then use Gaskell's speed correction analysis to identify and fix a size variation || 6 weeks || Palmer || |
SPC Test Wish List
Here are the tests that are desired to be done during Phase E
Test |
Description |
Priority |
Effort |
Customer |
|
Action |
|||||
Pole Wobble |
Test the new modules that were changed in support of the Rosetta mission to support Pole Wobble. Std error. |
Action |
|
12 weeks prep + 12 weeks |
SPOC |
Shape 3 redo |
Run Approach phase testing to see if the improved procedures performs as well as test F4 |
Action |
8 weeks |
Jackson |
|
Max Slope |
Do a paremeter study of the impact of the MXSLP variable, currently used for 0.6 |
Action |
4 weeks |
Jackson |
|
OLA Albedo Integration |
Work out integration of albedo into OLA |
Action |
Lockheed - Lorenz |
||
Pole and Omega on F4 |
Need to run the pole and omega using F4's final shape model. May need Gaskell to train |
Action |
2 weeks |
Palmer |
|
High |
|||||
FDS Integration |
Develop the procedures and run an Approach/PreSurvey test that works on the transition to landmark navigation that contains multiple sets of data being passed |
High |
8 weeks |
FDS |
|
Image Quality |
Generate a shape model using low(er) quality images that contain PSF, blur, hot pixels and cosmic rays |
High |
8 weeks |
AltWG |
|
Asteroid wall |
Process Lockheed's asteroid wall |
High |
12 weeks |
Lockheed |
|
NFT-SPC Thread Test |
Generate NFT Features and use for Decent to TAG simulation |
High |
scope is uncertain |
Lockheed - Lorenz |
|
Enhanced Imaging |
Develop requirements and imaging plan to support. Develop high resolution DTM's based upon it |
High |
12 weeks |
SPOC |
|
Medium |
|||||
Operations Test: Parallel processing and team |
Run Preliminary Survey and Detailed Survey portions of the mission using multiple people and multiple machines |
Medium |
8 weeks |
SPOC |
|
Update F2/F3 with Cross Correlation |
Recompute the RMS using manually process and a Normalized Cross Correlation |
Medium |
3 weeks |
Palmer |
|
Low |
|||||
Wiki version |
Update Wiki with version number on all modules |
Low |
2 weeks |
Palmer |
|
Go to Tahiti |
Need a vacation |
Low -- never going to happen |
0 weeks |
Palmer |
|
Must be prioritized |
|||||
Dynamics test |
Do an evaluation of SCOBJ and PTG with and without the use of dynamics |
|
4 weeks |
Palmer |
|
Uncertainty test |
See the effect of different amounts of uncertainty in the solution of SPC |
|
4 weeks |
Palmer |
|
Have starting model signif different than truth |
The existing Shape 4 is only 2 meters different than the Nolan model. Run a test where we greatly increase the deviation between starting and truth |
|
12 weeks |
Jackman |
|
NavCam distortion |
Put in camera distortion for the source images and see how well SPC removes it. This is more needed for NavCam |
|
5 weeks |
Jackman |
|
Size vs. speed error |
Have a model that has a systematic error so that the size of the model is off. Then use Gaskell's speed correction analysis to identify and fix a size variation |
6 weeks |
Palmer |
Anybody want anything else?