Differences between revisions 4 and 17 (spanning 13 versions)
Revision 4 as of 2015-11-24 17:56:35
Size: 1589
Editor: DianeLambert
Comment:
Revision 17 as of 2015-11-25 13:43:43
Size: 2821
Editor: DianeLambert
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
'''Purpose of test:''' . '''Purpose of test:''' To evaluate SPC's ability to represent a simplified 'boulder' which has a constant 20 degree slope.
Line 8: Line 8:
 * .  * To investigate the effect of including various combinations of viewing conditions, specifically:
  * Variation of spacecraft azimuth;
  * Variation of sun zenith (incidence);
  * Variation of spacecraft zenith (emission angle);
 * To investigate the effect of the number of images and viewing conditions.
Line 11: Line 15:

The 'boulder' was simulated by generating a simple axe-symmetric, flat-topped cone (peak) with a constant 20 degree slope. Two boulder simulations were generated:
 * A single peak in an otherwise flat landscape of width ?? - Modeled using a single maplet (no overlaps).
 * Multiple peaks and (simplified) craters in an otherwise flat landscape of width approx. 22.5m.
Line 15: Line 23:
 * Image Suite: Image resolutions: 50cm, 20cm, 10cm, 5cm.
  * emission
    * .
  * incidence
    * .
    * .
 * Image resolutions: 2cm/pixel.
Line 22: Line 25:
Note that a larger image suite was planned and produced than was utilized during test. The images for a number of planned viewing conditions were eliminated due to image quality related to the viewing conditions being unfit for SPC. For further details are contained here: [[Test11STU Unfit Viewing Conditions]]. Note that a larger image suite was planned and produced than was utilized during test. The images for a number of planned viewing conditions were eliminated due to image quality related to the viewing conditions being unfit for SPC. For further details are contained here: [[Test11STU Unsuitable Viewing Conditions]].
Line 29: Line 32:
'''Test11S'''
Line 30: Line 34:
Spacecraft: {{attachment:Over11S_EE0057_sc_plot_resized.png}}
{{attachment:Over11S_EE0057_sun_plot_resized.png}}
Line 32: Line 37:
{{attachment:SC_perfectF2_POLARS.jpg||width=300}} '''Test11T'''
Line 34: Line 39:
Sun: {{attachment:Over11T_EE0057_sc_plot_resized.png}}
{{attachment:Over11T_EE0057_sun_plot_resized.png}}
Line 36: Line 42:
{{attachment:SUN_perfectF2_POLARS.jpg||width=300}} '''Test11U'''

{{attachment:Over11U_EE0057_sc_plot_resized.png}}
{{attachment:Over11U_EE0057_sun_plot_resized.png}}
Line 42: Line 51:
Starting topography defined from: ? Starting topography defined from: START1.MAP at pixel/line location 49, 49.
Line 45: Line 54:
||35cm-Tiling||
||18cm-Tiling||
||9cm-Tiling||
||5cm-Tiling||
||10cm-Tiling||10cm||1.3||130||20m||
||5cm-Tiling||5cm||1.3||250||20m||
||5cm-Iterations||5cm||-||-||20m||
Line 50: Line 58:
'''Tiling/Iteration Parameters'''
Line 51: Line 60:
'''Iteration Parameters''' Auto-Elimination Parameters: 0, 60, .25, .25, 0, 3.
Line 53: Line 62:
Reset albedo/slopes: ?YES Reset albedo/slopes: NO
Line 55: Line 64:
Calculate Central Vector: ?YES Determine Central Vector: YES
Line 57: Line 66:
Differential Stereo: ?YES Differential Stereo: YES
Line 59: Line 68:
Shadows: ?NO Shadows: YES
Line 63: Line 72:
[[Test11STU Comparative Results]] '''Results with Overlaps:'''

[[Test Over11STU Comparative Results]]

[[Test Over11S Results]]

[[Test Over11T Results]]

[[Test Over11U Results]]

'''Results without Overlaps:'''

Spacecraft Zenith Variations

Aim and Objectives

Purpose of test: To evaluate SPC's ability to represent a simplified 'boulder' which has a constant 20 degree slope.

Additional Objectives

  • To investigate the effect of including various combinations of viewing conditions, specifically:
    • Variation of spacecraft azimuth;
    • Variation of sun zenith (incidence);
    • Variation of spacecraft zenith (emission angle);
  • To investigate the effect of the number of images and viewing conditions.

Methodology

The 'boulder' was simulated by generating a simple axe-symmetric, flat-topped cone (peak) with a constant 20 degree slope. Two boulder simulations were generated:

  • A single peak in an otherwise flat landscape of width ?? - Modeled using a single maplet (no overlaps).
  • Multiple peaks and (simplified) craters in an otherwise flat landscape of width approx. 22.5m.

Data

  • Data was generated by .
  • Location and parameters for evaluation area.
  • Image resolutions: 2cm/pixel.

Note that a larger image suite was planned and produced than was utilized during test. The images for a number of planned viewing conditions were eliminated due to image quality related to the viewing conditions being unfit for SPC. For further details are contained here: Test11STU Unsuitable Viewing Conditions.

Name

Sun

S/C Az

S/C Zenith

Total Number of Images

Test11S

45, 0, -45

every 45

0, 30, 60

80

Test11T

45, 0, -45

every 45

0, 20, 40, 60

112

Test11U

45, 0, -45

every 45

0, 15, 30, 45, 60

144

Test11S

Over11S_EE0057_sc_plot_resized.png Over11S_EE0057_sun_plot_resized.png

Test11T

Over11T_EE0057_sc_plot_resized.png Over11T_EE0057_sun_plot_resized.png

Test11U

Over11U_EE0057_sc_plot_resized.png Over11U_EE0057_sun_plot_resized.png

Bigmaps

The following TAG1 bigmaps were tiled/iterated and evaluated:

Starting topography defined from: START1.MAP at pixel/line location 49, 49.

Step

GSD

Overlap Ratio

Q Size

Width

10cm-Tiling

10cm

1.3

130

20m

5cm-Tiling

5cm

1.3

250

20m

5cm-Iterations

5cm

-

-

20m

Tiling/Iteration Parameters

Auto-Elimination Parameters: 0, 60, .25, .25, 0, 3.

Reset albedo/slopes: NO

Determine Central Vector: YES

Differential Stereo: YES

Shadows: YES

Results

Results with Overlaps:

Test Over11STU Comparative Results

Test Over11S Results

Test Over11T Results

Test Over11U Results

Results without Overlaps:

Test11S Results

Test11T Results

Test11U Results

Discussion

Spacecraft Zenith Variations (last edited 2015-12-16 16:48:31 by DianeLambert)